Buzz phrases like BYOD and CoIT are newest additions to the acronym-heavy jargon enterprise IT professionals bandy about. With Apple‘s introduction of smart devices like the iPhone and iPad, and Google, Microsoft and other companies piling on, the new workplace is becoming populated with Millennials unwilling to depend on corporate IT to dictate their tools and user experience.

One way to look at them is through comic-colored glasses. Think of this new bread of corporate workers as the mobile superhero—faster than a viral cat video, ready to leap corporate firewalls in a single click.

 

Dennis Hopper’s best TV spot

May 29th, 2010 | Posted by admin in advertising | culture - (1 Comments)

Dennis Hopper is known for his iconic roles in Easy Rider, Apocalypse Now, and Blue Velvet. He was an out-there bad boy on the counter culture edges, and became a new kind of Hollywood rebel.

There are lots of tributes about his unforgettable film rolls. But I want to honor his role a spokesman for broadband company Broadwing. Who else could have made a pitch for hosting and IP connectivity almost metaphysical and spiritual. Here are a few of the commercials I’m talking about:

Boom and Bust

June 25th, 2008 | Posted by admin in business | culture - (0 Comments)

This is a repost from 2001. Given the housing markets and economic instabilities, it seemed like we should give it another read.

DC9AAF48-3009-4415-A711-83F5DF49400D.jpg

Boom and bust. The words conjure black and white images of giddy 1929 flappers, flasks of bootleg booze, and horrified stock traders watching their speculative fortunes fall like yesterday’s tickertape. Our generation’s boom and bust sent scooter-riding, Starbucks-sipping Americans clicking to Monster.com seeking ever bigger paychecks then bemoaning the loss of their stock options and plans to retire at 29.

Like Icarus, high-flyers rose magnificently only to fatally fall back to the old economy’s terra firma. Companies such as MarchFirstNapster, and Kozmo.com, stormtroopers of a seemingly inevitable economic and cultural blitzkrieg, crumbled under the weight of unattainable dreams—a modern tragedy worthy of the Greeks.

The sharp prick of reality that finally popped the inflated bubble of VC funded, speculative start-ups shouldn’t have surprised anyone with enough smarts to run a lemonade stand. In hindsight, it’s appallingly obvious that profitless companies worth billions on paper and nursed along by Pollyannaish investors are about as competitively viable as a three-legged gazelle. A new and sustainable business model needed to emerge for legitimate and innovative ideas to prosper in the marketplace.

But how could a boom have gone so wrong? Were the dot com dreams of Net-driven innovation and boundless optimism for the future just the folly of a pampered, technologically obsessed American generation out of touch with economic reality? Sure, a little bit. But booms and busts are a phenomenon that can happen to anyone in any industry.

Pipe dreams and tulip troubles
Culturally, telephone companies are as far from the dot com image as you can get—all geek, no chic. Yet they also succumbed to the boom and bust cycle.

Predicting an exponential growth in data traffic with the rise of the Internet, Qwest spent tens of billions of dollars to lay as much new fiber optics as the combined existing networks of AT&T, MCI and Sprint. Other billion dollar spenders like Winstar, e.spire, Teligent and Covad went bankrupt building fiber networks to compete with local phone giants like Verizon or Southwestern Bell.

All these new fiber networks required routers and switches. So equipment makers like Cisco and Lucent became Wall Street sweethearts with market caps to prove it.

The entire industry bought unabashedly into a ‘build it and they will come’ mentality. The result was a staggering glut of fiber capacity that all the voice calls, spam, porn, warez and assorted silly multi-megabyte Quicktime movies that North Americans email to each other didn’t come anywhere close to fully utilizing.

Profits evaporated in a previously robust industry. Long Distance prices fell so precipitously that telecom icon AT&T was forced to break into pieces just to survive. Lucent is similarly plotting how to fashion a raft from its shipwrecked stock price.

But booms and busts aren’t confined to technological sectors or even this century. Another older and non-technological example of economic bubbles is what history has dubbed the Great Dutch Tulip Fiasco. Along with windmills, dykes and wooden shoes, 17’th century Holland produced top-notch tulips. In fact, Dutch tulips were so highly prized that the market went insane—for a while at least.

Speculative investors leveraged all they owned to buy into the tulip bulb market. If you thought dot com stocks were through the roof, wait till you hear that really, really nice tulip bulbs once went for the equivalent of tens of thousands of dollars. Finally the absurdity of all this occurred to merchants and a cascade of sensibility returned the tulip market to reality. But, in doing so, many were left penniless.

The cosmic connection
Economies, markets and individual companies actually behave with the comforting regularity of any ordered system. Corporations compete according to the same Darwinian rules that any living species must follow. Creatures or markets that expand too rapidly will overpopulate, consume too many scarce resources and suffer the consequences.

Like stars that transform their nuclear fuel into new elements then explode them across the galaxy to form new suns and planets, economic booms forge new business models, technologies, attitudes and workers that become the fuel for future growth.

Workers of failed dot coms are using their knowledge to start new ventures and invigorate older stable companies. Innovations like broadband access, online shopping, digital music and Net-enabled B2B transactions aren’t going away because a company that popularized it went belly up.

Booms and busts are inescapable cycles. Like good and evil or Yin and Yang, they must be accepted as a package deal. The bust times are the price we pay for the advances that come during the boom.

Taiwan-based Acer is acquiring Gateway for $710 million. The deal will push the combined firm to the Number 3 spot in global PC market share by units shipped, and moves the new and improved Acer past its mainland China-based rival Lenovo Group. It also positions them to make further gains against industry leaders HP and Dell in the U.S. market.

Although Acer/Gateway will have about a 10.8% share of the U.S. PC market, it’s far smaller than HP, with a 23.6 percent share of the U.S. PC market, and Dell, with 28.4 percent. Acer/Gateway will have about 9 percent of the global market, compared to HP and Dell with 19.2 percent and 16.1 percent respectively.

In a world where newspapers routinely report multi-billion dollar tech deals, it seems conspicuous that the Gateway deal is valued just in the hundreds of millions. Its an acknowledgement of, among other things, how Gateway fumbled its brand management. Over the years, Gateway offered a schizophrenic image to consumers, with multiple new logos and forays into offering TVs and other consumer electronics confusing the audience as to what type of company Gateway was.

Acer Chairman J.T. Wang and other executive said they are ready for a “major change in corporate strategy” by embracing a multibrand approach. The combined company will market PCs in U.S. stores like Best Buy and others using the eMachine and Gateway brand names.

This isn’t a bad strategy, with HP already optimizing shelf space with both HP and Compaq branded PCs. But Acer President Gianfranco Lanci said a “good reason [for the merger] is that the Gateway brand is a very well-recognized brand in the U.S. ” and that it allows Acer to target different segments of the consumer market.

That sounds great in a press release, but it will take a long-term view by Acer to actually establish what the Gateway brand stands for in the minds of consumers.